Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer
From: andyr@wizzy.com (Andy Rabagliati)
Subject: Re: OCCAM3
Organization: W.Z.I.
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 1994 02:28:29 GMT
Message-ID: <CuLw7I.GEH@wizzy.com>

In article <14304588851827519940815163818@comlab.oxford.ac.uk>,
Geraint Jones <Geraint.Jones@wolfson.oxford.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>I hope that "implementation restriction" is a technical term meaning that it
>is seen as being valid occam2, but not supported by that compiler, because
>the author could not be bothered to work out how to do the storage allocation.
>(Or am I being silly again?)

Being silly again :-)

The storage allocation is an easy, well-known problem. In fact,
it is no different for functions than for procedures.

Cheers,     Andy.


