Newsgroups: comp.parallel.pvm
From: bess@immd5.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Ruediger Bess)
Subject: Different implementations of PVM: good ones and bad ones ?
Organization: Regionales Rechenzentrum Erlangen, Germany
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 1994 10:20:34 GMT
Message-ID: <392gdiE252@uni-erlangen.de>

I was told that the speedup you get with pvm depends on the 
pvm implementation, and some (most? all?) of the public 
domain implementations are performing very poor.
My problem is: I know only one pvm implementation (which is 
referred to in the FAQ).

Are there in deed other implementations, maybe commercially 
distributed ones ?
Or was it a canard ?


