Newsgroups: comp.parallel.mpi
From: flynnr2@alum01.its.rpi.edu (Richard F. Flynn, Jr.)
Subject: Query: chimp vs lam vs mpich MPI implementations
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY, USA
Date: 15 Feb 1995 10:03:47 GMT
Message-ID: <3hsji3$h5o@usenet.rpi.edu>

Would anyone care to comment on or point me in the direction of any
bodies of knowledge regarding the relative merits of the various
MPI implementations?  I've been poking about lam and mpich mostly,
have or am reading the docs, etc, but just wondered if a the
collective voices of experience had any comments, sage wisdom, etc.

As an FYI, I'd be looking to use it on a bunch-o-workstations . . .

rick

Richard F. Flynn               COM: rick@salomon.sbi.com Work:  +81 3 5255 4485
Salomon Brothers Asia Ltd      EDU: flynnr2@rpi.edu      FAX:   +81 3 5255 5858
2-2, Otemachi 2-chome                                    Beeper:+81 3 5100 1920
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100 JAPAN                              Home:  +81 3 3586 2054
-- 
Richard F. Flynn               COM: rick@salomon.sbi.com Work:  +81 3 5255 4485
Salomon Brothers Asia Ltd      EDU: flynnr2@rpi.edu      FAX:   +81 3 5255 5858
2-2, Otemachi 2-chome                                    Beeper:+81 3 5100 1920
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100 JAPAN                              Home:  +81 3 3586 2054

